<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2 Timothy 2:16 Godless Chatter, Getting Real, Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lutheranforums.com/blog/2009/02/25/2-timothy-216-godless-chatter-getting-real-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lutheranforums.com/blog/2009/02/25/2-timothy-216-godless-chatter-getting-real-transparency/</link>
	<description>no longer walking away when God opens a door</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://lutheranforums.com/blog/2009/02/25/2-timothy-216-godless-chatter-getting-real-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lutheranforums.com/blog/2009/02/25/2-timothy-216-godless-chatter-getting-real-transparency/#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>To whom it may concern:
I sent this twice because you stated that I made a mistake on the first submission. See? Another pain.....and just to write a simple comment. Simple, but important.
BTW, if you need a proofreader, email me.
Hannah
I&#039;m sorry to have to mention this, but look at the following part of a sentence from the article above: &quot;Its incredible hard to define, as realness and transparency.......&quot; There is also another error down further. 
It is &quot;INCREDIBLY&quot; hard to read serious articles with errors like this. I can&#039;t take you serious. C&#039;mon!!! Nobody saw that before publishing?
After the second mistake I stopped reading. I really needed an answer about chatter. Still, I haven&#039;t found one. Maybe in the future, I&#039;ll try reading from this page again.
Cordially,
Hannah W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To whom it may concern:<br />
I sent this twice because you stated that I made a mistake on the first submission. See? Another pain&#8230;..and just to write a simple comment. Simple, but important.<br />
BTW, if you need a proofreader, email me.<br />
Hannah<br />
I&#8217;m sorry to have to mention this, but look at the following part of a sentence from the article above: &#8220;Its incredible hard to define, as realness and transparency&#8230;&#8230;.&#8221; There is also another error down further.<br />
It is &#8220;INCREDIBLY&#8221; hard to read serious articles with errors like this. I can&#8217;t take you serious. C&#8217;mon!!! Nobody saw that before publishing?<br />
After the second mistake I stopped reading. I really needed an answer about chatter. Still, I haven&#8217;t found one. Maybe in the future, I&#8217;ll try reading from this page again.<br />
Cordially,<br />
Hannah W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

